It's that time of year again - classes are over and I'm grading exams and projects. This term I was teaching an introductory Economic Statistics course and an elective grad. Econometrics course. I've graded the latter exams., but I'm buried in about 200 scripts for the undergraduate course. I've also got the term projects for the graduate course to go through. They look really good!
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Monday, April 23, 2012
Natural Resources and Canadian Real Income Growth
In today's issue of The Daily, Statistics Canada has released a terrific study titled "The Role of Natural Resources in Real Income Growth". The paper's authors are John Baldwin and (former UVic. grad. student) Ryan McDonald. (H.T. to Ryan for bringing this to my attention.)
The study itself is extremely comprehensive, and provides some interesting new results about long-term economic growth in Canada. You can download the pdf version from here.
Drop-Down Menus for R
A few days ago, Andrew Barr had a great post on his blog. It was titled, "R is not just for nerds....it has drop-down menus!" You can bet that this one caught my eye when it was re-posted on R-Bloggers.
Briefly, Andrew takes us through the installation and basic use of the Java Gui for R (JGR) in conjunction with the Deducer package. Andrew noted in a previous post last month that a big advantage that JGR (say "Jaguar") has over the alternative GUI interfaces for R that are around is that it genuinely cross-platform, and will work in the same way on different operating systems.
I'm definitely going to be playing with it!
© 2012, David E. Giles
Saturday, April 21, 2012
Bayesian Econometrics - Forty Years On
My Ph.D. dissertation was in Bayesian Econometrics. I started working on the dissertation early in 1973, and Arnold Zellner's classic text had been available for just over a year. So, perhaps not surprisingly, one of the first things that I did was to sit down and go through his book with a fine tooth comb. It took quite a while, but it was time well spent!
Friday, April 20, 2012
More on Confidence Bands for the HP Filter
Last December I had a post (and a subsequent correction) relating to a method for constructing confidence bands for the Hodrick-Prescott (H-P) filter. More specifically, I proposed a way of constructing a confidence band for the trend, or long-run growth component, of a time-series that has been run through the H-P filter.
A few people suggested to me that it might be worth writing up the material more formally, so I've done just that. You can find the working paper version here.
I've included two applications in the paper - both of them different from the one that I used in the blog post. One application relates to the U.S. unemployment rate, and the other involves U.S. real value-added output.
Feedback would be appreciated!
I've included two applications in the paper - both of them different from the one that I used in the blog post. One application relates to the U.S. unemployment rate, and the other involves U.S. real value-added output.
Feedback would be appreciated!
© 2012, David E. Giles
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Extremes, the Generalized Pareto Distribution, and MLE
In a recent post I discussed some of my work relating to modelling extreme values in various economic data-sets. The work that my colleagues and I have been undertaking focuses on the use of the Generalized Pareto distribution (GPD). The estimation of the parameters of this model facilitates estimates of Value at Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES).
There are various ways of estimating the parameters of the GPD but, not surprisingly, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) is a common choice. However, there are some real traps when it comes to estimating the GPD using MLE, and they're worth knowing about if you're into this sort of thing.
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Surplus-Lag Granger Causality Testing
My previous posts (here, here, and especially here) on Granger causality testing have attracted more interest than I anticipated. One of the things that I've discussed at some length is the "surplus-lag" approach that can be used when the data are possibly non-stationary and possibly cointegrated. In particular I've talked about the Toda and Yamamoto (1995) procedure, but there are alternatives such as those introduced by Dolado and Lütkepohl
(1996) and Saikkonen and Lütkepohl (1996).
These modifications to the standard approach to testing for Granger (non-) causality are needed to ensure that the Wald test statistic has its usual chi-square asymptotic null distribution. You can't just test in the usual way unless the data are stationary. In fact, the "surplus lag" approach has advantages even beyond those that we knew about already.
These modifications to the standard approach to testing for Granger (non-) causality are needed to ensure that the Wald test statistic has its usual chi-square asymptotic null distribution. You can't just test in the usual way unless the data are stationary. In fact, the "surplus lag" approach has advantages even beyond those that we knew about already.
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
The Journal of Universal Rejection
Handling the econometrics submissions to this journal shouldn't be too onerous a task!
© 2012, David E. Giles
Monday, April 16, 2012
Modelling Extremes
Modelling extreme events is a challenging business. By definition, you're dealing with observations that are way out there in the tail(s) of the distribution. But that's where a lot of exciting things happen!
Sunday, April 15, 2012
The Popularity of Statistical Packages
No matter what your favourite statistical package is, you'll find this post by Robert Muenchen highly informative.
Robert concludes that:
"By most of the measures discussed here, R is competing well with the commercial software vendors. However, I advise not over generalizing from this data. SAS and SPSS continue to dominate the corporate world and Stata is doing quite well in the scholarly arena. Each of these packages is dominant in one market or another."
© 2012, David E. Giles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)